TribLIVE’s daily and weekly email newsletters deliver the news and information you want straight to your inbox.

What the police believe may have been a prank 911 phone call on Wednesday where the Latrobe Elementary school closed when authorities were investigating a reported threat, Greater Latrobe District officials said. The situation was resolved shortly before 2 p.m. and no one was hurt. Concerned parents who gathered outside the Lincoln Avenue Police Department were told that the release would take place at the normal time.

City and state police were called to Cedar Street School just before 1:00 p.m. and officials searched the building after an anonymous call was made to Westmoreland 911 reporting a threat. All district buildings were then locked.

“Agencies believe this threat may have been a prank,” district officials said in a Facebook post.

Latrobe police said they are investigating the source of the call, which was found not to be credible. Anyone with information is asked to call the police at 724-537-5526. Officials from other nearby departments helped on the ground.

Tracy Mather of Latrobe said the parents had been notified of the situation via an automated district telephone system. She is the parent of a third grader.

Pupils in kindergarten through sixth grade attend school there. The police stayed at the school until they were released.

Support local journalism
and help us keep covering the stories that matter to you and your community.

TribLIVE’s daily and weekly email newsletters get the news and information you need right to your inbox.

You are solely responsible for your comments, and by using you consent to ours
Terms of Use.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide an essential commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed comments that improve the quality of our news and information.

While most comments are posted when they are topic-related and not abusive, they are moderators Subjective decisions. We will do it as carefully and consistently as possible. Due to the amount of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments that represent a range of views that express their point of view quickly and politely. We strive to protect discussions from repeated comments by the same or different readers

We follow the same taste standards as the daily newspaper. A few things we will not tolerate: personal assault, profanity, vulgarity, profanity (including explosives and letters followed by dashes), commercial advertisements, imitations, incoherence, proselytization, and SCREAMING. Don’t add URLs to websites.

We don’t edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or in extracts from an article. In this case we can correct spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we do not want comments to stall with discussions about our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate readers and people cited in articles or blog posts pointing out factual or highlighting errors and investigating all allegations. But these suggestions should be sent
by email. In order not to distract other readers, we do not post comments suggesting a correction. Instead, corrections are made in a blog post or article.